Brushing up HBR fundamentals will provide a strong base for investigative reading. Often readers scan through the business case study without having a clear map in mind. This leads to unstructured learning process resulting in missed details and at worse wrong conclusions. Reading up the HBR fundamentals helps in sketching out business case study analysis and solution roadmap even before you start reading the case study. It also provides starting ideas as fundamentals often provide insight into some of the aspects that may not be covered in the business case study itself.
|Published (Last):||28 August 2006|
|PDF File Size:||16.56 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.75 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
As bananas be came more of a staple in every home so do Chiquita Bananas. Chiquita decided to have operations out of Colombia. Some of these groups settled in the areas where Chiquita had facilities. Chiquita run into problems with theses groups around , mainly with FARC …show more content… These men were only concern with company growth and performance, since they were getting compensated for on the metrics. The company felt, as it was their duty to protect their employees.
Its choice to pay the AUC was a decision that could have been adverted. Alternative actions could have been taken. For example it they could have hired security or move out of Colombia.
Even though both of these are risky and high costing decisions, they still were decisions that were over looked just for financial gain. The company probably felt as if paying the AUC was cheaper than hiring its own personal to insure employee safety.
After all this is Chiquita has to move forward. Its current CEO Fernando Aguirre should acknowledge its wrongs but also reinforce its already established ethical code of conduct. This code should be one that top management upholds themselves. The top management set the example for all of its employees. It should uphold.
Case Study: “Blood Bananas” Essay
Colombia has been a very perilous country for many people, but now it is coming out of the effects of narco terrorism and civil war. It was in , when one of the subsidiaries of Chiquita Corporation had revealed to the United States Justice Department that, it was paying off money to different terrorist groups for protecting their employees. An investigation had begun immediately and Chiquitaentered a plea agreement. No matter what the situation was, it was an unethical way of doing business by justifying it throughthe egoism theory and disturbed environment of Colombia. The company had somehow moved out of their ethical dilemma of making payments to terrorists but it is now facing major challenges to restore its reputation and regain its competitiveness in future. A number of things could be now done by the CEO of Chiquita to restore its reputation such as becoming more transparent, following core ethical values, compensating the people of Colombia and strictly creating ethical boundaries of conducting business in Colombia. In my opinion, the actions of Chiquita stem from a number of different reasons which led to their ultimate conviction.
Blood Bananas: Chiquita in Colombia Case Study Analysis & Solution
It stays to get excavated. A several years ago, Borsato leased ninety acres of the seemingly unsullied home twenty miles absent. President Monthly bill Clinton apologized to the Guatemalan federal government for that atrocities fully commited via the U. They stick to a certain rule of life Blood Bananas Chiquita in Colombia but agreement no religious obligations. The CIA also believed This might support it much better fully grasp the workings of Latin American communist events, on which issue the CIA experienced hardly any true information. The agreement is claimed to generally be well worth two million pounds.
Blood Bananas Chiquita in Colombia Case Study Help - Case Solution & Analysis
They had subsidiaries around the world; Colombia was one of those countries. The outcomes of saying no is getting you, your family or employees kidnapped, raped or even killed in the cruelest ways possible. They have no mercy. Three were the possible complex solutions, 1. Say no and continue its operations as they used to. Rubik Atamian in UTPA and since the beginning of it, he thought us and wanted us to know the difference between morals and ethics. In the accounting field, professionals are faced with these two things, that is the reason why the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed, because people had either no ethics or not proper morals.