In our case, typical his preference for a better squares for outposts derive endgame, but also acceptable is from the nature of the central the Nimzowitschian approach, pawn formation, and are d4 for with , gfl-el, to be followed White and f5 for Black. In both cases, It is well known that in the superiority of knight vs French-like pawn structures bishop is quite evident. According to attacking purposes as well. In the ly resulting in a sacrificial French hybrid of the Caro breakthrough. Dramatic de- Advance, occurring after
|Published (Last):||12 June 2004|
|PDF File Size:||12.11 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.45 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Hello all! I am no stranger to Chess. One of my chess rivals at a local club enjoys playing the Carro-Kann against me. I am relatively confident in my ability to outplay this gentleman if the line diverges from well-known bookwork, even though he is rated or points higher than me. However, I am having one heck of a time busting this opening and turning it into something that has effective play for White. I suppose the difficulty I am having is testament to the strength of the opening Are there any good continuations for white that the Carro-Kann struggles to deflect?
Failing this, what weaknesses does it have that I can attempt to exploit? Any advice is more than welcome. Thank you for your time and thanks for posting! But try taking control of the centre as soon as possible, but if you keep advancing pawns then off they go, plus develop your pieces sounds obvious but again it controls space and just lets loose the powerful bits and pieces on the board.
Attack d6. Archaic71 Jan 20, 4 I know that I do not enjoy playing against the Advance line at all. My record against it is pretty even, but it tends to suck out my soul during development.
Follow the Author